Paper, Plastic, or Jute: what’s best for shopping bags?

Latest posts by Prof. Mike Ashby (see all)

carrier-bagsFew products get a worse press than plastic shopping bags.  They are distributed free, and in vast numbers.  They are made from oil.  They don’t degrade.  They litter the country side, snaring water-birds and choking turtles.  Add your own gripe.

Paper bags are made from natural materials, and they bio-degrade.  Surely it’s better to use paper?  And come to think of it, why not bags made out of jute – it’s a renewable resource – and use them over and over?  That must be the best of all?

A lot of questions. The function of an eco-bag is “containment with minimum carbon footprint”.  So perhaps we should start by using CO2 footprint as the measure of ‘goodness’ or ‘badness’, and examining some real bags with approximately the same capacity (Figure 1 and Table 1).

Polyethylene Bags: Bag 1 is a typical one-use supermarket container.  It is made of polyethylene (PE) and it weighs just 7 grams.  Bag 2 is also PE but it is 3 times heavier and the designer graphics tell you something else: the bag is a statement of the cultural and intellectual self-image of the store from which it comes (it is a bookshop).  It is attractive and strong, too good to throw away, at least not straight away.

Figure 1. Shopping bags. The lightest weighs 7 grams, the heaviest weighs 257 grams.

Paper Bags: Bags 3 and 4 are made of paper.  Paper bags suggest a concern for the environment, a deliberate avoidance of plastic, good for company image.  But there is more mass of material here – about 7 times more than that of Bag 1.

Reusable Bags:   And finally, re-usable bags – “Bags for life” as one UK supermarket calls them.  Bag 5 is an example.  It is robust and durable and looks and feels as if it made from a woven fabric, but it’s not – its polypropylene.  The color, the “Saving Australia” logo and the sense that it really is green propelled this bag into near-universal popularity in Australia.  Here is how one Aussi paper put it: “Forget the little black dress.  The hot new item around town is the little green bag”.

But isn’t shouting “Green” and “Save the planet” a little bit, well, yesterday?  Today is Bag 6. Discrete, understated, almost – but not quite – unnoticeable.  And those who have one have the quiet satisfaction of knowing that it is made of Juco, a mix of 75% jute and 25% cotton.  But it uses a great deal of material – 36 times more than Bag 1.The material facts

Table 1.  The characteristics of the shopping bags

Bag Material Mass (g) Material CO2 footprint (MJ/kg)* CO2 footprint, 100 bags(kg) How manyre-uses?
1 Polyethylene (PE) 7 2.1 1.5 1
2 Polyethylene (PE) 20 2.1 4.3 3
3 Paper 46 1.4 6.4 5
4 Paper 54 1.4 7.6 6
5 Polypropylene (PP) 75 2.7 20.3 14
6 Juco(75% Jute,25% cotton) 257 1.1 28.3 19

*  From the material records of CES EduPack

From what we’ve found out already,  you will see the difficulty.  We have wandered here into a world that is not just about containment, it is also about company image and self-image.  Our interest here is eco-analysis, not psycho-analysis.  So consider the following question.  If the 7 gram plastic bags are really used only once, how many times do you have to use the others to do better in eco-terms?  The fourth column of Table 1 lists its values for the carbon footprints of PE, PP, paper, and juco (that for jute includes spinning and weaving).  Multiplying these values by the masses, taking 100 bags as the unit of study, gives the fifth column.  Dividing these by the value for the single-use Bag 1 gives the number of times the others must be used to provide containment at lower carbon per use than Bag 1 – last column.

Now you must make your own judgment.  Would you re-use a paper bag five, six, or more times?  Unlikely, they rip quite easily and get soggy when it rains, and if you don’t, the familiar supermarket plastic bag (bag one) wins over paper (bags 3 and 4).

What about the reusable bags?   Would you use the green PP  bag (Bag 5) more than 14 times?  I have one and it has already been used more than that, so it looks like a winner.  Finally Bag 6, the thinking-peoples eco-bag, is less good than plastic until you’ve used it nineteen times.  Not impossible, provided nothing leaks or breaks inside it causing terminal contamination.

So from a carbon and energy point of view, single-use bags are not necessarily bad – it depends how meticulous you are about reusing any of the others.  The real problem with plastic is its negligible value (so people discard it without a thought) and its long life, causing it to accumulate on land, in rivers and lakes and in the sea where it disfigures the countryside and harms wildlife.

Further Reading

Shen L. and Patel, M.K. (2008)  “Life Cycle Assessment of Polysaccharide Materials: A Review” J. Polymer Environ., vol.16, pp. 154–167.  (A survey of the embodied energy and emissions natural fibers.)

González-García, S., Hospido, A., Feijoo, G. and Moreira, M.T. (2010) “Life cycle assessment of raw materials for non-wood pulp mills: Hemp and flax Resources” , Conservation and Recycling  vol. 54, pp.  923–930

CES EduPack supports and enhances teaching at over 800 universities and colleges worldwide, providing resources and software to support university-level education in science, engineering, and design. It allows students to quickly browse and search for materials information (such as the carbon footprint used here), as well as perform material selection projects, chart material properties, and assess the environmental impact of different material choices within a design project. CES EduPack also provides access to a growing library of teaching resources on Granta’s Teaching Resource Website.

12 thoughts on “Paper, Plastic, or Jute: what’s best for shopping bags?

  1. Mark Koopman

    An insightful analysis, and quite similar to that included in Dr. Ashby’s excellent text, “Materials and the Environment.”

    At our home, we wash cotton, canvas and combined fabric bags if they get a spill from some meat product, or otherwise soiled. And, although I’m not keeping a record, I am certain we have canvas bags at our home that have been used at least 100 times. I wonder if there might be solid consumer usage data on the final column of the Table? If not, this is certainly an area that should be studied. If there is existing data (which would certainly vary by culture and region), this would make a commendable addition to the next edition of the book, and perhaps in this blog, as well.

  2. Ric Werme

    You wash fabric bags? That must use a lot more energy than is in a single use plastic bag. The environmental cost of washing them should be taken into account. The health cost of not washing them should be too!

  3. Dan Hatton

    Interesting stuff, thank you very much, Prof. Ashby. One extra piece of input data for, and one call for further study along the lines of, this analysis:

    The extra piece of input data: Edwards and Fry (2006, _Life cycle assessment of supermarket carrier bags: a review of the bags available in 2006_, Environment Agency, Bristol) suggest that 76% of the so-called “single-use” bags of type 1 are in fact re-used at least once in some capacity.
    The call for further study: Contrariwise, there is always a certain probability that a “single-use bag” of type 1 will not even be used once, because it will tear under the weight of shopping (or even under the stress of being separated from a stack of bags and opened) before it ever leaves the checkout. At least two major supermarket chains have attempted to to reduce the environmental impact of their type 1 bags by reducing their thickness, and therefore the mass of PE used: it would be interesting to know whether these design changes have altered this probability of zero use.

  4. Dr. Mahesh N S

    In India some state governments have banned PE / plastic bags less than 20 micrometers thick. The strategy was to discourage the production of less recyclable specification. In addition, supermarkets have started charging for carry bags to make customer aware. Paper bags are not popular here. The strategy as consumer should be “Buy plastic bag and use it atleast 7-10 times, dispose it scientifically”.
    Alternatively, jute bags can be a good choice. This is because, normally cottage industries make them and using them can contribute for a social cause in addition to environmental protection.
    The ‘mantra’ shall be “Carry the carry bag with you while going for shopping”

  5. Fanny Boyd

    This table is very much helpful for judging the difference among these three types of bags. Thanks for sharing it with us.

  6. printed paper bags

    Using the same carrying capacity of paper versus plastic,
    over the course of two years paper bags consume about 1155 MJ.
    Use paper grocery bags that are biodegradable and environmentally friendly
    or whatever, recycle plastic bags by accepting new addition in the store.
    Paper bags can hold more stuff per bag anywhere from 50 percent
    to 400 percent more, depending on how they’re packed, since they hold more
    volume and are sturdier.

  7. Callum Palmer

    There really are a ton of options out there when it comes to choosing the type of bag that you want for your store. However, the article does a fantastic job of breaking down all of the options and suggesting which ones might be better for different situations. I’ve personally always preferred reusable bags because you can just chuck them back into the car and bring them out again when you go shopping.

  8. sapna

    I love the post, Nowadays jute bags demand are realy very high because jute bags are looking stylish, fashionable and ecofriendly also. Jute Bags are Light, long-lasting and reusable so that i always prefer to use Jute Bags. Various types of jute bags are available in market like Fashion jute bags, beach jute bags, Christmas jute bags, office jute bags, shopping jute bags, travel jute bags and wine jute bags so i consider to use jute bags for Make Your Own Style Statement.


Leave a Reply to printed paper bags Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *